Pretty much all that the liberals will be able to say is that FOX sucks or cannot be trusted. They have no hard evidence.
We have the videos of the attack, we have the President on tape first blaming the attack on an obscure Youtube video as well as tape of the Sec of State Promising one of the SEALs killed that the maker of said tape would be prosecuted. Then we have the President denying that he blamed the video then insinuating he had not chance to respond and then blaming a lack of military readiness. Now we have a few military leaders that are being fired as scapegoats.
The situation was s poorly handled that the only real out seems to be blaming the only source of opposition news. The source does not alter fact.
Fox reported what the Obama administration reported publicly about the cause of the attack, what intelligence they had, when they found out and what they did about it. Anyone who look at the facts and timeline should reasonably conclude that the Obama administration lied.
All of it. These "sources familiar with what was happening on the ground," for example. Who were they, and why doesn't Fox News say who they are, like they kept demanding Harry Reid to do regarding his source about Mitt Romney paying no taxes in past years? Fox News also likes to use the speculation of conservative bloggers and portray it as the fruits of investigative journalism.
And considering the standard they use to accuse Obama of lying, this too should be considered lying.
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
None.
Pretty much all that the liberals will be able to say is that FOX sucks or cannot be trusted. They have no hard evidence.
We have the videos of the attack, we have the President on tape first blaming the attack on an obscure Youtube video as well as tape of the Sec of State Promising one of the SEALs killed that the maker of said tape would be prosecuted. Then we have the President denying that he blamed the video then insinuating he had not chance to respond and then blaming a lack of military readiness. Now we have a few military leaders that are being fired as scapegoats.
The situation was s poorly handled that the only real out seems to be blaming the only source of opposition news. The source does not alter fact.
Fox reported what the Obama administration reported publicly about the cause of the attack, what intelligence they had, when they found out and what they did about it. Anyone who look at the facts and timeline should reasonably conclude that the Obama administration lied.
I don't watch Fox, they are too conservative and i've never met a conservative that didn't lie and twist things around.
better time spent, read this book;The Republican Brain: The Science of Why They Deny Science- and Reality
From what i have seen, nothing. Far as Iran-contra is concerned, no one broke the law. Reagan didn't sell weapons to the iranians.
All of it. These "sources familiar with what was happening on the ground," for example. Who were they, and why doesn't Fox News say who they are, like they kept demanding Harry Reid to do regarding his source about Mitt Romney paying no taxes in past years? Fox News also likes to use the speculation of conservative bloggers and portray it as the fruits of investigative journalism.
And considering the standard they use to accuse Obama of lying, this too should be considered lying.
They aren't lies, and I'm certain the left can't possibly name any, because they don'/t watch the News.
I hear crickets because the liberals don't have this question in their scripted rhetoric binder.
I hear MSNBC already blamed Bush.
It was all true, They didn't lie.