Verified answer

I liked watching both movies. And I enjoy the fact that they're very different. What was cool then, now isn't. What was nerdy then, now isn't, and vice versa. They portrayed how the world changed, and they appeal to wider groups of people now, being so different from each other. While the same concept, it was executed well in both movies, getting across their different messages.

As for the actors...I liked Garfield's Spiderman and Peter Parker version a lot more, simply because of his humor. Too bad it wasn't enough, because I wanted more. It gave me the idea that, yeah, a superhero like that could actually exist in the real world. He has human characteristics. He was humanized better.

Thinking back, something regarding Maguire's complaining and crying all the time was off for me. I couldn't express it, but I knew it. Everytime he cries, it just seems...unnatural. At least to me.

So there you have it. Cheers.

The Original Spiderman is always better !

All the way for Toby Maguire.

Amazing Spiderman(Andrew Garfield)

Toby Maguire

The story of Maguire's was better, but Andrew was a lot better actor. I mean Maguire played him as an unattractive nerdy guy who was constantly troubled yet supposed to be intelligent, while Garfield played something much closer to comics where his is awkward and nerdy but the fact is Parker is supposed to also be an attractive and charming in a cute and awkward/funny way, while Andrew also brought to life the science and brilliantly high intelligence in Parker (although his script did help).

Toby Maguire.

Well, I thought the new Spiderman movie was bad, but the actor played the role decently I guess. I'd still go with Toby.

In execution in thoughts in comedian books via fact the early Nineteen Seventies, i'll nominate Spider-guy on account that Batman could fall into default via fact began a protracted, slow slide into turning out to be a paranoid and brooding character which undid the cumulative results of the terrific thoughts wherein Batman ever appeared. Spider-guy is a superb character to Batman, in case you look on the way the two have been utilized in maximum thoughts for the previous fifteen to 20 years. In thought, Batman is an inherently extra exciting character than Spider-guy. Batman's large skill became into pizzed away some time past via undesirable characterization, on a similar time as Spider-guy has in many situations appeared in thoughts that upward thrust far above the factor which might seem to be his organic obstacles. finally, the secret's interior the writing no longer interior the character, and Batman has been consistantly exceeded off to writers who ought to have regularly occurring extra effective than to proceed crappy character progression concepts.

Andrew Garfield because he's cute and he didn't take much time to tell his girlfriend that he is Spiderman.

Didn't see the remake, but the original was much better than the other two movies by Toby McGuire.