i personally like shawn michaels more his gimick seems more realistic than undertakers and undertakers deadman gimick is so boring now. i would have liked to see michaels end takers streak
With all do respect to The Undertaker, I have always preferrred Shawn Micheals by a lot. Shawn is a true legend (as is 'Taker) but I honestly feel Shawn has done more for for the wrestling business than most other wrestlers. He's funny, he's amazing in the ring, he's phenomenal on the mic and he's a better all round performer. I realize that both are getting old and both are considering retiring soon but Micheals' matches are so much better and he can still do the things he did 20-odd years ago.
Both are injury prone but I see Micheals lasting that little bit longer outta the two and his move set is much better. I honestly can't fault Shawn Micheals but The Undertaker is nowhere near my Top 10 wrestlers whereas Shawn is #4.
Well I've always been huge fans of The UnderTaker and Shawn Micheals, both are in my top 5 favorite wrestlers of all time.
However when I attended WrestleMania 25, before I wasn't sure about who I was going to cheer for, then I found myself cheering HBK, so at WM 25 I cheered the HeartBreakKid.
It's also true that Shawn Micheals has never changed his gimmick once, hes always been HBK, UnderTaker has changed gimmicks atlest twice.
Seriously does anyone really think Taker is better than Shawn? Shawn is the best performer in the history of professional wrestling bar none. He adapts to every type of match and his performances at Wrestlemania's are always stunning (Steve Austin, Razor Ramon, Bret Hart, Chris Jericho, Kurt Angle, John Cena, Undertaker) he even managed to carry Vince to a good Wrestlemania match. Undertaker is only good because he looks scary.
Depends which Shawn Michaels you're talking about. I can't stand him when he's on his own, but i like DX shawn michaels. Undertaker is alright either way.
Shawn Michaels because at least he has real angles still. Undertaker ended his gimmick years back when people stopped treating him as supernatural, and he started the American Badass crap in 2000. Undertaker isn't relevant anymore, all he has is some meaningless streak. He's basically as ruined as Kane, except he has more fans.
definitely shawn michaels. im a fan of takers however shawn is so talented i agree should have ended the streak. but the streak should have been ended by kevin nash anyway
Both are one of the best entertainers of WWE and i can't make a comparison between them. I respect both and they both are still entertaining us in this age too.
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
With all do respect to The Undertaker, I have always preferrred Shawn Micheals by a lot. Shawn is a true legend (as is 'Taker) but I honestly feel Shawn has done more for for the wrestling business than most other wrestlers. He's funny, he's amazing in the ring, he's phenomenal on the mic and he's a better all round performer. I realize that both are getting old and both are considering retiring soon but Micheals' matches are so much better and he can still do the things he did 20-odd years ago.
Both are injury prone but I see Micheals lasting that little bit longer outta the two and his move set is much better. I honestly can't fault Shawn Micheals but The Undertaker is nowhere near my Top 10 wrestlers whereas Shawn is #4.
The Undertaker
Well I've always been huge fans of The UnderTaker and Shawn Micheals, both are in my top 5 favorite wrestlers of all time.
However when I attended WrestleMania 25, before I wasn't sure about who I was going to cheer for, then I found myself cheering HBK, so at WM 25 I cheered the HeartBreakKid.
It's also true that Shawn Micheals has never changed his gimmick once, hes always been HBK, UnderTaker has changed gimmicks atlest twice.
Seriously does anyone really think Taker is better than Shawn? Shawn is the best performer in the history of professional wrestling bar none. He adapts to every type of match and his performances at Wrestlemania's are always stunning (Steve Austin, Razor Ramon, Bret Hart, Chris Jericho, Kurt Angle, John Cena, Undertaker) he even managed to carry Vince to a good Wrestlemania match. Undertaker is only good because he looks scary.
Depends which Shawn Michaels you're talking about. I can't stand him when he's on his own, but i like DX shawn michaels. Undertaker is alright either way.
Shawn Michaels because at least he has real angles still. Undertaker ended his gimmick years back when people stopped treating him as supernatural, and he started the American Badass crap in 2000. Undertaker isn't relevant anymore, all he has is some meaningless streak. He's basically as ruined as Kane, except he has more fans.
definitely shawn michaels. im a fan of takers however shawn is so talented i agree should have ended the streak. but the streak should have been ended by kevin nash anyway
word to the wise
The Undertaker, im sick of HBK's gimmick it hasn't changed since the rockers at least the Undertaker can change his character unlike HBK
Both are one of the best entertainers of WWE and i can't make a comparison between them. I respect both and they both are still entertaining us in this age too.
well for me shawn is the best he never gives up