I usually don't let the credentials of a candidate's work experience determine my vote, but they do have some influence on my decision. I'd like to hear what others think after briefing over some:
He's an INCUMBENT governor and for a border state.
He was the 9th secretary of energy (think gas prices)
He was the former ambassador to the UN, and has dealt with the notorious regimes of Kim Jong Il, Fidel Castro, and even went face to face with Saddam Hussein, plus he negotiated the release of two hostiges.
How is the governor lagging behind two junior senators, and a group of non-incumbent officials, one of which was only a mayor? I am actually rooting for the mayor but I was impressed by Richardson's moderate/centrist economic views during his appearance on Kudlow & Co. Would you consider him more qualified than the typical front runner?
Update:President wet back? You know a naturalized Mexican cancels your racist vote out. Too bad they're doing our agricultural and industrial economy greater good than your expensive red neck labor of terrible quality.
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
I'm not considering Richardson because of his debating. When i watch him, all he does is read his credentials for the most part, "Im the CEO, i saved so and so, i've done this,i've done that." too egotistical for a leader. He should be more for the people.
He and Joe Biden have the best experience in the Democratic pool of Candidates and his are the most diverse
NO he also loves illegals before Americans!
Put an American to work first!