Not a chance. Establishment republicans, and the donors, won't support him. He might get some of the independent and hipster votes, but liberals and progressives won't support him. Actually, most of the people who actually support Rand Paul are the kind of idiots who think not voting makes a better political statement than voting does.
And I bet that you were also one of the people that claimed that Ron Paul still had a chance even after only he and Mitt were left in the race and he still came in fourth. You are as bad as the idiots that seem to think that just because Hillary is married to Bill that she would be any good as President. Learn to base political opinion on facts rather than hero worship.
Rofl. You cannot find ONE issue that Rand Paul has ever discussed where he hasn't completely changed his position on said issue depending upon whom he is speaking to. He wrote the anti freedom personhood bill, then claimed that he didn't write his own bill or support his own bill. He supported the immigration reform bill, only to later claim that he never supported it. He claimed that he wanted to eliminate the civil rights law of 1964, then claimed that he never said that when he is on video saying exactly that. He claimed to be a libertarian, while incessantly supporting big government, anti freedom right wing policies. He claimed to support pot legalization, then whined that the president wasn't being tough enough on drug users and demanded that the president enforce drug laws. He is such a revolting hypocrite. Please bother to research this loser.
Oh, I'm sure Mr. Paul will run. Win? Not on your life, not if Hillary runs. If she declares place your money on her in Vegas, she'll be the surest bet since the 85 Bears.
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
He's the only Republican that I might support.
Not a chance. Establishment republicans, and the donors, won't support him. He might get some of the independent and hipster votes, but liberals and progressives won't support him. Actually, most of the people who actually support Rand Paul are the kind of idiots who think not voting makes a better political statement than voting does.
And I bet that you were also one of the people that claimed that Ron Paul still had a chance even after only he and Mitt were left in the race and he still came in fourth. You are as bad as the idiots that seem to think that just because Hillary is married to Bill that she would be any good as President. Learn to base political opinion on facts rather than hero worship.
Rofl. You cannot find ONE issue that Rand Paul has ever discussed where he hasn't completely changed his position on said issue depending upon whom he is speaking to. He wrote the anti freedom personhood bill, then claimed that he didn't write his own bill or support his own bill. He supported the immigration reform bill, only to later claim that he never supported it. He claimed that he wanted to eliminate the civil rights law of 1964, then claimed that he never said that when he is on video saying exactly that. He claimed to be a libertarian, while incessantly supporting big government, anti freedom right wing policies. He claimed to support pot legalization, then whined that the president wasn't being tough enough on drug users and demanded that the president enforce drug laws. He is such a revolting hypocrite. Please bother to research this loser.
Oh, I'm sure Mr. Paul will run. Win? Not on your life, not if Hillary runs. If she declares place your money on her in Vegas, she'll be the surest bet since the 85 Bears.
Who would you put in for the person who will plagiarize all his speeches? What about the person who will be in charge of ending the civil rights act?
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/kentucky-...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/09/chris-hay...
Good for you. Keep looking through those rose colored glasses.