Verified answer

Definitely not! The allegations were made by gold diggers with a get rich quick scheme!!

♥♥We Love You Michael!!!!♥♥

I'm not really sure. The jury found him "not guilty" but we all know that California juries let celebrities get away with pretty much everything, including murder. It's very odd for a "man" in his forties to have little 10-year-old friends and give them "Jesus Juice" and sleep in the same bed with them. No adults that I know do that.

I don't believe he was guilty.No parent can be dumb enough to chance taking their child to an old mans house out of ignorance.Especially if he was repeatedly called a child molester.It is pure common sense.They had be up to something.Also half the time they could not keep their story straight.He does need help though,but I don't believe he was guilty for that.

Yes he should be guilty. In my mom's opinion the only reason he is not guilty is that he is rich therefore leads him to really good lawyers. But that is only an opinion.

Definitely guilty. And he's not the only celebrity that molests children. There are many, I'm sure. Being a celebrity doesn't mean you're not sick.

No doubt in my mind he is guilty-doesn't really matter though because he will never pay for what he did.

yes I believe he's guilty and his fame and money are why he was acquitted anyone else would be sitting in jail right now

nope. not at all. i think people were accusing him because of his weird look,his fame,and his money. society is truly going down hill these days and ignorant people roam far and wide -_-

I Think So

he thinks he's peter pan. thats why he created neverlnd for kids...i mean boys only.