I know we saw spartacus defeat the egyptian within 5 seconds and I believe if you were to put the 2 of then in the arena (with their chosen weapons) spartacus would still win.

Ive noticed how the egyptian usually waits for his oppenent to attack before he comes in really fast with his little daggers (look at his fight with the roman men). I think spartacus beat him because he wasnt rushing in with attacks like gannicus and crixus did only to get knocked down. He was patient and waited for the egyptian to attack first before knocking him down.

In the arena I believe spartacus would keep the egyptian and his short daggers at a distance and eventually kill him. The Egyptian is still a bad *** though probly second best fighter after spartacus.

Just my opinion. Anyone agree/disagree