WCW already exist, its called smack down. They have the World heavyweight, US, and also cruiserweight championships, all championships that were in WCW. plus i could not handle another wrestling show
WWE needs to eliminate the "brands." It has only hurt them in the long run. Smackdown has done horribly for so long. ECW is pretty much a failure as it cant compete with TNA and ask any true ECW fan, its not ECW.
As soon as TNA gets better time slots, which has to happen any time now, WWE is going to be in a world of hurt. They need to go back to the "Attitude" years and have one brand "WWE" and have all the wrestlers wrestle on multiple nights. Then they can also fire a good third of their roster of "never-will-be's" and actually put on some good shows.
they own WCW, its not a question of a brand extension, its more of a question on why Vince berried it. and the answer is, WCW was a very high profile, more popular, and his biggest competitor.
Vince bought it not to save it, but to Barry it, get rid of it. Its a bad dream of his and he is not going to allow it to come back.
Personally, I think he should, and put the original WCW people back on it. It would certainly boost his ratings :)
no.I think wwe should only start up with raw and shouldn't have added 3 brands in the first place.There were great with just raw,then they got smackdown and it was ok,but not that good,then its horribale that they have 3 brands!I liked ECW but did wwe really need to take the extreme part away?
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
WCW already exist, its called smack down. They have the World heavyweight, US, and also cruiserweight championships, all championships that were in WCW. plus i could not handle another wrestling show
WWE needs to eliminate the "brands." It has only hurt them in the long run. Smackdown has done horribly for so long. ECW is pretty much a failure as it cant compete with TNA and ask any true ECW fan, its not ECW.
As soon as TNA gets better time slots, which has to happen any time now, WWE is going to be in a world of hurt. They need to go back to the "Attitude" years and have one brand "WWE" and have all the wrestlers wrestle on multiple nights. Then they can also fire a good third of their roster of "never-will-be's" and actually put on some good shows.
they own WCW, its not a question of a brand extension, its more of a question on why Vince berried it. and the answer is, WCW was a very high profile, more popular, and his biggest competitor.
Vince bought it not to save it, but to Barry it, get rid of it. Its a bad dream of his and he is not going to allow it to come back.
Personally, I think he should, and put the original WCW people back on it. It would certainly boost his ratings :)
no.I think wwe should only start up with raw and shouldn't have added 3 brands in the first place.There were great with just raw,then they got smackdown and it was ok,but not that good,then its horribale that they have 3 brands!I liked ECW but did wwe really need to take the extreme part away?
No...WCW suffered enough during the last 4-5 years. Bringing it back would do to me what the new ECW did to the old ECW's fans: PISS ME OFF!
No. The brands are already watered down versions of what WWE should be. Why not make it elite like it used to be?
IT will never come back as WCW because it sucked