It saddened me he died for nothing in the end he probably still got his way. The journal was probably published and everyone knew anyway. I want Moore to resurrect him!
I thought it was. I actually had a lump in my throat. His facial expressions and tone of his voice were perfect. I'd go as far to say that it was better executed in the movie.
it was over fast, but it was still very emotional. his dialogue, he's cold, he's crying, and he'd rather die than compromise- like somebody said earlier, he's the only true hero.
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
I believe it was, he was the only one who really felt they were doing something wrong and wanted to stop it! But instead he was killed.
Yes. The actor who plays him played his heart out.
As for the other characters, didn't care about any of them. The only good character was Rorschach.
It saddened me he died for nothing in the end he probably still got his way. The journal was probably published and everyone knew anyway. I want Moore to resurrect him!
I thought it was. I actually had a lump in my throat. His facial expressions and tone of his voice were perfect. I'd go as far to say that it was better executed in the movie.
it was over fast, but it was still very emotional. his dialogue, he's cold, he's crying, and he'd rather die than compromise- like somebody said earlier, he's the only true hero.
I thought it was. (didn't cry) but i thought it was a big moment, It kind of showed that in the end he was the only real hero.
Not particularly. It was over pretty fast, not too much drama about it.
i thought the acting was great and you knew what was coming and was still saddened
nope?
you tell me
WARNING MAJOR SPOILER!