Polar bear research paper?
I need to write a 5 page issue paper involving polar bears and I need to focus on a specific issue that has 2 sides so i can argue one over the other. I was thinking about writing an essay on the effects of global warming on the polar bear population but it needs to be more specific.
Some examples of good topics include: should nations be allowed to harvest whales; should the harvest of sharks be banned
thanks for all the help
More Questions From This User See All
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
What about polar bears living in the zoo and what natural instincts they tend to lose?
wild polar bear vs zoo polar bear?
but..if you choose to talk about banning killing sharks/whales.. you could add how killing them off ruins the life cycle/food chain..i forgot what the specific name of it is..
Truly the IUCN pink list argue that polar undergo populations are at hazard from climate alternate and this is the reason they're on the list (they're it appears the only species that has been placed on the purple list for future risks to populace simplest): "The comparison is situated on a SUSPECTED population reduction of >30% within THREE generations (45 years) due to decline in discipline of occupancy (AOO), extent of incidence (EOO) and habitat nice." also Dr Mitch Taylor is a biologist now not a local weather scientists. His positions is (and that i quote his words): "Polar bears, as a species, don't show up to be threatened or in decline situated on the data that I’ve seen on the reward time, although some populations do appear to be experiencing deleterious effects from local weather exchange." When questioned about carbon dioxide stages and climate trade: "my information comes from the Inter-governmental Panel on local weather change (IPCC)" "That i will’t reply, it’s past my expertise." "once more, that’s past my capabilities" despite the fact that it must be famous that he would not appear to agree with the scientific conclusion that humans are having a web outcomes on world warming. So in his conclusion: "sure. I’m relatively involved about the way forward for the polar endure however no longer due to the fact that I believe anthropogenic carbon dioxide goes to intent uni-directional climate change. I’m worried for the reason that the last ten years have seen a warming development within the Arctic that has already impacted a couple of populations, and i don’t suppose we quite understand the basis purpose for that warming yet." i suppose you could call him skeptical, as he would not believe AGW nevertheless argues that an UNKNOWN component is causing the climate alterations within the Arctic (again although that is beyond his skills, as he always states. He alternatively offers opinions).